You know how all those reporters, when they talk about Myanmar, always add “formerly known as Burma”?
Why are they doing that?
I’m will to bet that at least 80% of the American public have no idea where Burma might be, and certainly no idea where Myanmar is, so what’s the point?
It’s hard to hear anything when you have your fingers in your ears and keep mumbling ‘NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAH’…
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom in my pants #moviesinmypants (Lordy this is fun)
As a follow-up to my Wal-Mart screed, here’s an interesting article looking at Costco and other companies that have concentrated on higher wages and better treatment of the lowest strata of their employee [more...]
I’ll have to think about this during my flight to Siam.
The reporters are playing a game called word association. You are correct that most people have never heard of Myanmar and couldn’t pinpoint it on a map to save their lives. (I also doubt most people could pinpoint Burma on a map.) However Burma is a name they know. They don’t know anything about the country but they’ve heard the name. There are still plenty of people alive that remember or were told the events of WW II. And those that watch the History Channel no doubt know about General Merrill and his troops known as Merrill’s Marauders and his attack in Burma. And I’ve seen many shows on the Burma Road. Reporters are trying to “connect” with the viewer/listener by throwing in something that sounds familiar and the best they can come up with is “formerly known as Burma”