http://www.towleroad.com/2013/03/russertperkins.html
“If love becomes a definition of what the boundaries of marriage are, how do we define that going forward?” Perkins asked.
So, he’s finally admitted that “marriage” has nothing to do with love?
http://www.towleroad.com/2013/03/russertperkins.html
“If love becomes a definition of what the boundaries of marriage are, how do we define that going forward?” Perkins asked.
So, he’s finally admitted that “marriage” has nothing to do with love?
This is something I’ve wondered about for a while — the odd sight of Republicans wanting to repeal anything that puts money into the pockets of their biggest donors. As Mark Schmitt points out, “The [more...]
Now we see why Mitt loves Paul: “Maybe Harry Reid’s mysterious source that Romney didn’t pay taxes for a decade was really a time-traveler from the future. If Romney wins, it could very well be true [more...]