Hmm. So, Bush has decided to demolish Abu Ghraib prison.
I can’t decide which more accurately describes this — yet again — pointless gesture. Why don’t you pick one?
1. Out of sight, out of mind!
2. Destroy the evidence.
Hmm. So, Bush has decided to demolish Abu Ghraib prison.
I can’t decide which more accurately describes this — yet again — pointless gesture. Why don’t you pick one?
1. Out of sight, out of mind!
2. Destroy the evidence.
You know how the Bush administration keeps making those claims that we’re safer with him as president? Think again: The State Department acknowledged yesterday that it was wrong in reporting terrorism declined [more...]
The Washington Post has published, in exhaustive detail, a story outlining exactly what has happened along the Gulf Coast since Hurricane Katrina began plowing toward New Orleans. It spares no one –local or [more...]
Dana Milbank reports that the 2004 campaign is something like a game of “telephone.” Here are some quotations as they came out of Democratic nominee John F. Kerry’s mouth — and how President Bush [more...]
Primarily, 2) Destroy the evidence, but both would seem to work for Bushy.
First of all, Welcome Home, Gene! There–I took care of the Immigration Department’s abrubt attitude!
Now– I wonder how many people think, as I do, that this prison demolishing is just some sort of weird “See, we didn’t really mean it, guys!” apology. A kind of “Look at us destroying that mean old prison which killed those people through no fault of our own.” Does Dubya and Co. really think that prison abuse will stop because a run-down building got knocked over? Jeezus!
Kat