Hmm. So, Bush has decided to demolish Abu Ghraib prison.
I can’t decide which more accurately describes this — yet again — pointless gesture. Why don’t you pick one?
1. Out of sight, out of mind!
2. Destroy the evidence.
Hmm. So, Bush has decided to demolish Abu Ghraib prison.
I can’t decide which more accurately describes this — yet again — pointless gesture. Why don’t you pick one?
1. Out of sight, out of mind!
2. Destroy the evidence.
Ran across this: the brands associated with the presidential candidates. In a survey, three groups of voters — Bush supporters, Kerry supporters, and undecided voters — were asked to associate various brands [more...]
It’s incredible how the office of president has become such a home court advantage. The president makes a big showy campaign appearance at the Daytona 500, and my tax dollars paid for his motorcade to drive a few [more...]
That’s what the Republican right has created — an atmosphere where freedoms that America stands for have been set aside, and if you dare to dissent, you’re labeled as unpatriotic. They’re [more...]
Primarily, 2) Destroy the evidence, but both would seem to work for Bushy.
First of all, Welcome Home, Gene! There–I took care of the Immigration Department’s abrubt attitude!
Now– I wonder how many people think, as I do, that this prison demolishing is just some sort of weird “See, we didn’t really mean it, guys!” apology. A kind of “Look at us destroying that mean old prison which killed those people through no fault of our own.” Does Dubya and Co. really think that prison abuse will stop because a run-down building got knocked over? Jeezus!
Kat