Hmm. So, Bush has decided to demolish Abu Ghraib prison.
I can’t decide which more accurately describes this — yet again — pointless gesture. Why don’t you pick one?
1. Out of sight, out of mind!
2. Destroy the evidence.
Hmm. So, Bush has decided to demolish Abu Ghraib prison.
I can’t decide which more accurately describes this — yet again — pointless gesture. Why don’t you pick one?
1. Out of sight, out of mind!
2. Destroy the evidence.
I’m gonna be using that title a lot through November. It seems that every day brings another example of Dubya throwing stones from his glass house. For instance, yesterday Bush claimed that Kerry’s trade and [more...]
With language.
Conservatives, like most fascist groups, use the power of language to evoke an emotional response, repeating their talking points over and over and over until they are treated as fact.
The White House is admitting to a “blunder” in claiming that Iraq was pursuing nuclear weapons via African uranium. This 4-paragraph wire service version is from the notoriously right-wing Washington Times [more...]
Primarily, 2) Destroy the evidence, but both would seem to work for Bushy.
First of all, Welcome Home, Gene! There–I took care of the Immigration Department’s abrubt attitude!
Now– I wonder how many people think, as I do, that this prison demolishing is just some sort of weird “See, we didn’t really mean it, guys!” apology. A kind of “Look at us destroying that mean old prison which killed those people through no fault of our own.” Does Dubya and Co. really think that prison abuse will stop because a run-down building got knocked over? Jeezus!
Kat