Hmm. So, Bush has decided to demolish Abu Ghraib prison.
I can’t decide which more accurately describes this — yet again — pointless gesture. Why don’t you pick one?
1. Out of sight, out of mind!
2. Destroy the evidence.
Hmm. So, Bush has decided to demolish Abu Ghraib prison.
I can’t decide which more accurately describes this — yet again — pointless gesture. Why don’t you pick one?
1. Out of sight, out of mind!
2. Destroy the evidence.
You’d think that after years and years railing against the Bush gang I’d be taking some pleasure in the deterioration of it. But I feel oddly unphased. It could be because Bush and Cheney are still there; [more...]
Today’s Washington Post tells the story of the continuing Republican behind-the-scenes changes to how Congress does business. It seems that now they are weakening the rules on gifts – what Congressional [more...]
You know, the last time this whole “indecency on television” boondoggle reared it’s ugly head, the government came up with the ridiculous “V-Chip.” Remember that? What about TV content [more...]
Primarily, 2) Destroy the evidence, but both would seem to work for Bushy.
First of all, Welcome Home, Gene! There–I took care of the Immigration Department’s abrubt attitude!
Now– I wonder how many people think, as I do, that this prison demolishing is just some sort of weird “See, we didn’t really mean it, guys!” apology. A kind of “Look at us destroying that mean old prison which killed those people through no fault of our own.” Does Dubya and Co. really think that prison abuse will stop because a run-down building got knocked over? Jeezus!
Kat