Hmm. So, Bush has decided to demolish Abu Ghraib prison.
I can’t decide which more accurately describes this — yet again — pointless gesture. Why don’t you pick one?
1. Out of sight, out of mind!
2. Destroy the evidence.
Hmm. So, Bush has decided to demolish Abu Ghraib prison.
I can’t decide which more accurately describes this — yet again — pointless gesture. Why don’t you pick one?
1. Out of sight, out of mind!
2. Destroy the evidence.
What is the result of repression, whether political or religious? Revolution. This is why so there are so many cases of “religious” persons taking out their sexual frustrations on others. So, what happens [more...]
It’s interesting how so many journalists are starting to come to grips with the Bush administration after years of keeping silent. They have started to write stories about administration activities that lots of us [more...]
September 11 brought about hand wringing and a familiar refrain from many liberals: why do they hate us? Hard to answer sometimes, being entwined in oil and Mideast policy; but it’s gotten much easier lately: the [more...]
Primarily, 2) Destroy the evidence, but both would seem to work for Bushy.
First of all, Welcome Home, Gene! There–I took care of the Immigration Department’s abrubt attitude!
Now– I wonder how many people think, as I do, that this prison demolishing is just some sort of weird “See, we didn’t really mean it, guys!” apology. A kind of “Look at us destroying that mean old prison which killed those people through no fault of our own.” Does Dubya and Co. really think that prison abuse will stop because a run-down building got knocked over? Jeezus!
Kat