Hmm. So, Bush has decided to demolish Abu Ghraib prison.
I can’t decide which more accurately describes this — yet again — pointless gesture. Why don’t you pick one?
1. Out of sight, out of mind!
2. Destroy the evidence.
Hmm. So, Bush has decided to demolish Abu Ghraib prison.
I can’t decide which more accurately describes this — yet again — pointless gesture. Why don’t you pick one?
1. Out of sight, out of mind!
2. Destroy the evidence.
From the “calling the kettle black” files via the Washington Post: America Coming Together, the “527” group working to defeat Bush in November, gave new meaning to its name last week when the [more...]
Les Moonves, the CBS Chairman, says that political pressure played no part in the decision to yank the Reagan miniseries: “It was a moral decision, not an economic or a political one,” Moonves said in an [more...]
Hypocrisy frustrates me no end. You can tell, can’t you? Usually, it’s right wing hypocrisy that gets me riled up most, simply because they’re in power and their hypocrisy is so blatant. For instance: [more...]
From Gene’s Brain to Your Browser
Copyright © 2002–2020 Gene Cowan
Primarily, 2) Destroy the evidence, but both would seem to work for Bushy.
First of all, Welcome Home, Gene! There–I took care of the Immigration Department’s abrubt attitude!
Now– I wonder how many people think, as I do, that this prison demolishing is just some sort of weird “See, we didn’t really mean it, guys!” apology. A kind of “Look at us destroying that mean old prison which killed those people through no fault of our own.” Does Dubya and Co. really think that prison abuse will stop because a run-down building got knocked over? Jeezus!
Kat